Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Good/Bad Silhouette

If you live on the central eastern side of the USA, you have no doubt seen trains that look like this.

That strange logo is for the Chesapeake & Ohio RR, the C&O, or Chessie (Incidentily, the railroad line that John Henry died helping to build).
Anyway, as a youngster growing up in East Tennessee, I often watched this strange shape go by our car windows. I could never figure out what it was supposed to be. I mean, I knew it was a "C", but what was that organic shape in the middle? A country? I knew it wasn't the shape of Ohio, was it Chesapeake? What is Chesapeake"?

Something about it told me instinctively it was a cat. I think it was the ear shape on top. I often stared at patterns in carpet, woodgrain and floor stains and saw pictures, and this was no different. My Dr.Suess/Muppet fixated imagination told me it was an animal that looked like this:

Eventually, I asked my dad what it was, and he told me it was a kitten. Ah-ha! I was right! I had imagined the very thing that they were trying to get across! But something gnawed at me. It wasn't right. If they wanted to draw a kitten, why hadn't they done a better job? And why did they want a kitten to represent a mighty Railroad company?

Years later as I thumbed through a book of trains, I think it was when I was researching John Henry, I stumbled upon this advertising illustration:

What the - ?!! That is the kitten living in that "C"?? How was I supposed to recognize that?? (It's from a 1930's advertising campaign about sleeping like a kitten as you travel. The kitten's name was "Chessie".) Every recognizable shape is covered up by an invisible blanket, for Pete's sake!!

Which brings me to my point: When you draw a picture, or compose a shot, and you want something to be recognizable, work for good silhouette value. Breaking up a shape like this is camoflage. It's why animals have stripes and spots... to break up their sihouette so that they are more difficult to see.
It's not to say that all drawings must be in profile to have a clear silhouette, they just must be readable. And what's more, it's the action that must be readable more than the figure itself. It's the subtleties in posture, the tension and repose, that create the action and emotion. And as storytellers, that's what we want, right?

Of, course the consideration here is time. In filmmaking you only have an instant for an image to read to the audience. If you want your shot to say "cat crouching, ready to pounce", make it clear. It's the visual equivalent of mumbling if you don't. Granted there are times you want the audience to ask questions, to create mystery. But that's another post.

Try these on for size (we have lots of cats and kittens at our house. There's always something to draw):

And by the way, I still see things in floor stains, paint spatters and gravy left on my plate after Thanksgiving dinner.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Happy Thanksgiving!!


Hey everybody! I hope this post finds you well and content! I wish you all a great weekend.
And don't forget in all our indulgences on Thursday, to remember those who are in need. Well, just don't remember them... get out there and do something about it. If you don't have time to work in a soup kitchen, or deliver groceries, drop an extra dollar into that Salvation Army bucket!

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Film Work

Well, progress on my short film is coming slowly... My paying gig keeps getting in the way. But I am steadily making progress, learning Final Cut, and other technical things I never had to worry about before.

All the principle photography is shot, and I'm about ready to send some live action plates to Keith Lango to add his incredible animation.

Meanwhile, enjoy these stills that make no sense or real impression without seeing the story.
(I have better ones, but I'll feed those to you later).

Oh, and the blue lines are because these are quick screen grabs and the cut-off grid was turned on.


Saturday, November 11, 2006

I'm Back!

Many of you have been wondering why I left my blogging post for so long. The answer is easy: I've been busy.

Aside from a short vacation with my family and traveling to some High School Band marching competitions (my son's school just won the state championship), I've been working at Big Idea (still) and on my own stuff.

Recently, I was out in L.A. for the Screenwriter's Expo 5. I attended lots of great lectures by the likes of Dov Simons:

Michael Hague:

And an all day series with writers,directors and story artists from Pixar (Andrew Stanton, Brad Bird, Ronnie del Carmen and more).

The trip was great. I ran into many old friends, like Marc Vulcano, Ron Smith, Dan Wawrszezek, Jeff Croke, Chen-Yi Chang, Chuck Williams, Byron Howard, Everett Downing, Paul Briggs, Eddie Pittman and more. I stayed with my old pal T. Dan Hofstedt, so after full days of lectures and pitching ideas, we stayed up late playing guitar, ukulele & harmonica.

One highlight of the Expo was the chance to meet with some studios and pitch ideas (for a price, naturally). Attendants were able to sign up for 5 minutes with studio reps from many of the major, mini-major and minor studios. So I pitched a couple of scripts I've been working on. So far, two companies asked for treatments. Hope it pans out to something.

All in all, the trip was very, very educational. I came home, looked at my scripts and started re-writing.

It reminded me when I first started at Disney, inbetweening Roger Rabbit on "Trail Mix-Up". I thought I had done a decent job, then I took my work over to Ruben Procopio. As soon as my drawing was on his board, all my mistakes became glaring. Even before he started pointing them out. There's something about putting your work in a new spotlight that really brings out the weaknesses.

Surround yourself with people smarter and more accomplished than you are. That way you will be pushed to improve and you will continue to grow.